Post Content
Heyy designerss🍻! So, I'm actually all for speed.. Test earlier, ship faster, skip the convoluted 6-month process... Learning to move fast is a great skill and designers should have it nowadays.. But speed on its own isn't an accomplishment... That's where the AI debt comes from. When you pair that speed with good UX and real product strategy, the speed becomes powerful. Instead of just moving in the wrong direction faster...🥶 (Sorry, we mostly hear about the successful startups, but there are about 100x more of the ones who fail) It still gets me how many people are so desperate to move fast that they just open Claude, start chatting, and think they'll get great work out the other side.. Like the model is going to read their mind and know their product, their patterns, their standards.. We're all getting a little lazier by the minute.. But that laziness only pays off if the groundwork is there. Prepping Claude, onboarding it, feeding it the right context... that part is real work. Sometimes it's a lot of work.. And it's 10000% necessary if you actually want output that holds up. That's context engineering, basically. Building the docs, the examples, the system around the model so it understands your world before you ever ask it for anything. The way I think about it: if we want our prompts to get lazier and we want to be faster, our context has to get sharper, on point, always evolving, getting better with every mistake we feed back into it. The prompt can be three words at some point... The context behind it cannot That's it, happy Friday !! ☀️ | 45 comments on LinkedIn
This is a preview from LinkedIn. For the full post, visit the original link.